ChatGPT, a big language model that may consult with users, is one in all OpenAI’s groundbreaking models. While this technology has many benefits, some fear that it must be regulated in a way that ensures privacy, neutrality and decentralized knowledge. A decentralized autonomous organization (DAO) could possibly be an answer to those problems.
Firstly, privacy is a serious concern relating to using ChatGPT. To improve response, the model collects data from users – but this data may contain sensitive information that individuals may not need to open up to a government. For example, in the event you disclose your financial or medical history to ChatGPT, that information could also be stored and utilized in ways that you simply didn’t expect or authorize. If information is obtained by unauthorized individuals, it could lead to invasion of privacy and even identity theft.
Related: Artificial intelligence has a job to play in detecting fake NFTs
In addition, ChatGPT might be used for illegal activities reminiscent of phishing scams or social engineering attacks. By mimicking a human discussion, ChatGPT can trick users into revealing private information or taking actions they normally would not. It is critical that OpenAI establishes clear policies and procedures for managing and storing user data to deal with these privacy concerns. The DAO can make sure that the information collected by ChatGPT is stored in a decentralized manner where users have more control over their data and where only authorized entities have access to it.
Second, there may be a growing concern about political bias in AI models, and ChatGPT isn’t any exception. Some fear that the further development of those models may inadvertently reinforce existing social prejudices or perhaps introduce latest ones. An AI chatbot will also be used to spread propaganda or false information. This may end up in unfair or unfair outcomes which have a negative impact on each individuals and communities. Biased responses could also be model based, reflecting developer bias or training data.
Related: Cryptocurrency miners lead the following stage of artificial intelligence
The DAO can make sure that ChatGPT is trained on objective data and the responses it generates are analyzed by a big selection of individuals, reminiscent of representatives from various corporations, academic institutions and community organizations, who can detect and proper any biases. This would minimize the potential of bias by ensuring that ChatGPT decisions are taken from different perspectives.
The DAO may put in place a system of checks and balances to make sure that ChatGPT doesn’t reinforce existing prejudices in society or introduce latest ones. For example, the DAO may put in place a procedure to audit ChatGPT responses to make sure that they’re impartial and fair. This may mean impartial professionals will investigate ChatGPT comments and indicate any instances of bias.
Fair is fair. https://t.co/7nDEf6MOp1 pic.twitter.com/5KAmEXivAY
— Ted Cruz (@tedcruz) February 4, 2023
Finally, one other problem with ChatGPT is the centralization of data. The model has access to a wealth of knowledge, which is helpful in some ways. This may end up in a knowledge monopoly because knowledge is concentrated within the hands of a small number of individuals or organizations. Similarly, there may be a risk that purely human-machine knowledge sharing will change into the norm, leaving individuals completely depending on machines for collective knowledge.
For example, a developer who has a coding problem could have previously used Stack Overflow for help by posting his query and getting answers from other developers who could have encountered similar issues and located solutions. However, with the proliferation of AI language models reminiscent of ChatGPT, developers are increasingly asking a question after which getting a response without having to speak with other people. This may end up in less user interaction and knowledge sharing online – for instance on sites like Stack Overflow – and consolidation of data inside AI language models. This could significantly weaken human agency and control over the production and distribution of data, making it less accessible to us in the longer term.
I’m in the highest 2% of StackOverflow users. My content has been viewed by over 1.7 million people. And it’s unlikely I’ll ever write anything there again.
Which could be a much greater problem than it seems. Because it might probably be a canary within the mine of our collective knowledge.
AND… pic.twitter.com/YNZvFtwyfu
— Peter Nixey (@peternixey) March 26, 2023
There aren’t any easy answers to the complicated problem of data centralization. However, it underlines the necessity for a more decentralized strategy for knowledge production and transfer. The DAO, which offers a framework for a more democratic and open exchange of knowledge, may have the opportunity to assist in this case. Using blockchain technology and smart contracts, a DAO can enable people and organizations to collaborate and contribute to shared knowledge, while having more control over how that knowledge is accessed.
Ultimately, a DAO can offer a framework to oversee and manage ChatGPT operations, guaranteeing decentralized storage of user data, responses which are analyzed for bias, and a more democratic and open exchange of knowledge. The use of DAO could be a viable solution to those problems, allowing for greater accountability, transparency and control over the usage of ChatGPT and other AI language models. As AI technology continues to advance, it’s critical that we prioritize ethical considerations and take proactive steps to deal with potential issues before they change into an issue.
Guneet Kaur she joined Cointelegraph as an editor in 2021. He holds an MSc in Financial Technology from the University of Stirling and an MBA from Guru Nanak Dev University in India.
This article is for information purposes only and isn’t intended to be and shouldn’t be construed as legal or investment advice. The views, thoughts and opinions expressed herein are solely those of the creator and don’t necessarily reflect or represent the views and opinions of Cointelegraph.
