Written by 8:46 am Science & Technology Views: [tptn_views]

Facebook’s willing to reform its controversial cross-check program — but only parts of it

Meta has agreed to switch Facebook’s and Instagram’s cross-checking program, which exempts known users from the corporate’s automatic moderation system. IN updated blog post published on Fridaythe corporate shared its response to the Board’s recommendations, stating that it might make the cross-checking system “more transparent through regular reporting” in addition to adjust the factors used when adding people to this system “to raised have in mind the interests of human rights and equality.”

The Supervisory Board, or “independent body” that reviews Meta’s content moderation decisions, issued a complete of 32 recommendations in December on how Meta could improve its cross-checking program. Meta selected to totally implement 11 of those recommendations while partially adopting 15.

Facebook and Instagram’s cross-checking program has come under fire following a 2021 report Wall Street Journal revealed that Meta uses it to guard politicians, celebrities and popular athletes from the automated moderation system. According to Metathe system allows the corporate to use “additional levels of human verification” to posts shared by celebrities to avoid inappropriate deletion.

The Supervisory Board criticized the scheme, stating that it “seems more directly structured to handle business concerns” fairly than as a solution to further the corporate’s “human rights commitments” as previously claimed. As a part of its response, Meta agreed to implement recommendations that oblige it to take immediate motion on verified content “identified as potentially severely infringing.” It has also committed to reducing the backlog of its cross-checking program, which the Supervisory Board believes may cause harmful content to remain online longer than it should.

However, the Meta continues to be “assessing the feasibility” of a rule that will allow figures to opt out of the cross-checking program and fails to make five recommendations, including a suggestion to “publicly tag” some people using this system. program. It also rejected the Supervisory Board’s advice to notify users that it might take longer for Meta to take motion after they report someone’s post within the cross-checking program. You can read the complete list of recommendations and Meta’s answer to everyone here.

While the Supervisory Board calls Meta’s response a ‘watershed moment’ in a Twitter thread, just isn’t fully satisfied with the changes that the corporate desires to introduce. “Several elements of Meta’s response didn’t go so far as we really useful to realize a more transparent and fair system,” writes the Supervisory Board. “Meta has rejected the board’s suggestion that meritorious users be eligible for cross-checking protection… We will proceed to answer Meta’s specific responses in the approaching days and weeks.”

[mailpoet_form id="1"]