Evil is a posh concept that has been studied by philosophers from antiquity to the current day. Below we are going to see crucial positions regarding this phenomenon.
Evil is one among those concepts that we will discover thoroughly in practice. But, might be difficult to define. If someone asked us to differentiate between morally good and bad actions, we would definitely do it without much difficulty and speak about values and principles.
But if another person asked us to define it, theoretically we might probably run into some difficulties. This is because evil is a posh concept whose nature and dimensions are difficult to define.
Hence The concept of evil has a protracted history of philosophical discussion. Even today, some facets of this phenomenon proceed to be debated. Having said that, let’s take a more in-depth take a look at a few of crucial philosophical theories about this idea.
What is evil?
First of all, it’s price remembering there are not less than two concepts of wrongdoing: wide and narrow. Let’s take a take a look at what each of them consists of.
The broad concept of evil
The broad concept of a misdemeanor it covers any eventuality that harms or causes suffering to human beings. In this respect, the discomfort of a toothache is just as nagging as, for instance, betrayal.
Today, evil within the broad sense of the word has also been divided into two categories: natural and moral. The first includes all states of affairs that don’t result from the intention or negligence of ethical agents. Therefore, natural accidents and disease come into play here as natural vices.
Moral evil, however, results from the intention or omission of those involved. Thus, they include those human actions that harm others, similar to fraud or murder.
It must be noted that this idea is present in theological contexts and discussions concerning the problem of evil, which reflect the issue of explaining the character of evil in a world created by an omnipotent, omniscient and loving God.
Religion has a theological explanation for this, but philosophy is far broader regarding this idea.
The narrow concept of evil
On the opposite hand, the limited concept of evil it covers only those actions, characters, or events considered morally despicable.
In this sense, transgressions are attributed solely to moral agents (people) and their actions. The term is usually utilized in contemporary political and legal contexts.
Like this text? We think you may also enjoy reading: Friedrich Nietzsche: History and Contributions to Philosophy
Philosophical theories of evil
From precedent days, several famous philosophers theorized about evil. Here are a few of the foremost theories about it.
All unsuitable conduct is a product of ignorance
One of the primary philosophers to investigate evil was Socrates they attributed evil to ignorance. That is, he believed that no man would knowingly do unsuitable, but because he didn’t know what good was and learn how to act in accordance with it.
In this respect, the wicked wouldn’t act in this fashion if he had true knowledge of his error. If he knew that living the nice is the most effective solution to do it, he wouldn’t decide to do harm.
God and evil
Philosophical theories of evil began with attempts to resolve the issue of evil. – that’s, once they tried to reconcile the existence of evil (within the broad sense of the word) with an omnipotent, omniscient and good God or creator.
One theory that gives an answer to the issue of evil is Manichaean dualism. According to this position, the universe is the product of an ongoing struggle between two equal and everlasting first principles: God and the Prince of Darkness.
From these first principles, good and bad substances arise, that are continually fighting for supremacy.
For their part, early Christian philosophers similar to St. Augustine, advocated Neoplatonism. They argued it evil doesn’t exist as a substance or property, but because the absence of substance, form, and goodness.
For example, the evil of disease is the absence of health. The evil of sin is the shortage of virtue.
In such cases, God doesn’t create evil, because all of his creation is sweet. This is why, evil is the absence of being or the absence of excellent.
Like this text? We think you may also enjoy reading: What is Phantom Vibration Syndrome and How Can You Avoid It?
Evil: a natural quality of human beings?
Human beings have all the time been liable to evil. In fact, as a society, we’ve got even begun to feel a fascination and a certain curiosity concerning the wicked.
However, this attraction or propensity to evil revealed whether evil is a component of man or a learned trait.
In this regard, authors similar to Niccolò Machiavelli or thomas hobbes They say humans are inherently evil. According to this philosophy, the selfishness and survival instinct of humanity leads us to satisfy our own desires to the detriment of our peers. Therefore, the law and the state, entities that allow to control people’s behavior for the common good, grow to be essential.
Kant argues that there’s a radical type of evil in human nature. This implies that all people tend to subordinate the moral law to their very own interests, and this tendency is radical or rooted in human nature.
According to Kant, the duty of a superb man can be, in line with him categorical imperativeto set an example with morally correct actions. Rousseau, however, takes the other view by arguing this persons are inherently good and that society corrupts them.
The banality of evil
in the 20th century Hanna Arndt presents the concept of evil related to social groups and the state itself. Her reflections arise as an try to understand and evaluate the horrors of the Nazi extermination camps.
Arndt argues that evil is it’s neither natural to human beings neither is it a metaphysical category. Instead, it might be man-made and manifests itself only when it finds an institutional and structural space for it.
According to Arndt, the defining characteristic of radical evil is that it’s not done for reasons comprehensible to mansimilar to selfishness. It is solely done to strengthen totalitarian control and the concept anything is feasible.
Components of bad performance
Many modern philosophers imagine that the concept of evil is expounded to the concept of evil motion. In this sense, they argue that a foul person is one who does bad or inappropriate actions.
But what characterizes a misdemeanor? Some theorists have proposed the next:
- Presence of harm: the unsuitable actions must cause or enable significant harm to not less than one victim.
- Motivation: We also imagine that transgression requires some intention or motivation to do evil. If there isn’t a such intention, we imagine that we must always not consider it an act of misconduct.
- Emotional Impact: it has also been argued that as a way to be evil, we must feel a certain way or have a certain emotion once we act. Laurence Thomas, for instance, believes that villains enjoy causing harm or feeling hatred towards their victims.
- Responsibility: we assume that bad actions come from a morally responsible entity. This implies that although natural accidents can do quite a lot of damage, these phenomena cannot cause evil deeds because they aren’t moral agents.
Accordingly, evil acts are human, intentional, and convey suffering to the victim and a few pleasure to the wrongdoer.
But we will challenge this angle of bad actions. For example, if we attempt to detonate a bomb in a room stuffed with innocent people, however the police thwart the attempt, is the motion still bad despite the fact that no harm has been done?
Evil is a posh concept
As you may see, the concept of evil will not be easy to define and understand. Despite the proven fact that many philosophers have written their thoughts on this topic, the essential and sufficient conditions that actually define evil are still debated.
Maybe it would interest you…
